njp62's Blogs


1,324 Reputation Points (Ranked 226th)

View My:
Profile | Collection | Wishlist | Reviews | Blogs | Friends | Points

Does popularity equal quality

Published Monday 23 Aug 2010 1:14am | 12

 

Modern Warfare 2 is a popular game. It's sales are spectacular with feats such as being the biggest entertainment launch in history bringing in $310 million in it's first 24 hours. Since it's release it has topped the weekly Xbox live activity charts showing that it is the most played console game (I assume PS3 charts would be similar). The critics loved it with an impressive score of 94 on Metacritic.

 

Taking into account all of these factors MW2 should be considered one of the greatest if not the greatest current gen game but.......



If you look at any Internet forum this is quite the opposite. The majority of posts including MW2 are very negative. Whether their comments are regarding the glitches , overpowered classes, the disappointing campaign or the actual people that play MW2 one thing for sure is that the Internet crowd do not like MW2 .



This stark difference in opinion is a strange phenomenon but it is not that unusual. Halo 3 has had a similar, but less extreme, divide in opinion. Popular music artists/groups such as Lady Gaga or Nickelback have huge amounts of fans yet most people speak negatively of them. It is this phenomenon that brought about the phrase popularity does not equal quality.



I often wonder about how the quality of games and music should be judged and I have come to the conclusion that in fact popularity does equal quality. If a game is enjoyed by a lot of people even if it is flawed, requires no skill, is shallow etc. the simple fact that people enjoy it should be enough to say it's a quality game.



While personally I found MW2 to be an alright game (I prefer third person shooters) I think MW2 deserves the title of greatest game this gen purely because it's the most popular.

 

So what do you think ?

Do you agree that popularity equals quality?

How would you decide what the greatest game is ?

 

Thanks for reading my blog. Constructive criticism is welcome.

 

 


Read all of njp62's blogs » « Return to Top

 

COMMENTS (12)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Log in to comment or Register now!
Takuyafire
On Monday 23 Aug 2010 10:27 AM Posted by Takuyafire
Criticisms first: Expand on your opinion before concluding, it was too short because of this :D
Also read this for a helping hand on how to write more substantial blogs: http://nzgamer.com/takuyafire/blogs/1012/bloggers-guide-to-blogging.html

Good things: You used a troll for a catch phrase...that's bound to score you readers so kapai.

Answers:
1. No.
2. Certainly not.
3. By how good the game is.

In regards to that last answer, there really cannot be any one true "greatest game" because we all have different viewpoints on what is good and what isn't. I mean hell go look a the NZGamer StarcraftII comments.

Not only that but you need to take into account the amount of gamers now vs the start of this "gen" as well as the media increase in hype. MW2 was hyped so bad that when they released it people were pissed off at how terrible the game really was...we expected MW1 but better...what we got was a multiplayer expansion pack with a turd of a singleplayer.

So in my opinion a "greatest game" really can't exist or it literally has to be able to please everyone and I'm struggling to think of such a game in the current gen...I know games like NFSU really and even Diablo2 made a lot of people happy in the past...but now? Hell...maybe Mass Effect 2? I'm not sure.
 
*  
+ - 5
Reply This comment has been promoted by the community.  
guido
On Tuesday 24 Aug 2010 9:22 AM Posted by guido
No, popularity does not automatically equal quality. Marketing, mass hysteria and just being in the right place at the right time have all lead to something becoming popular but it does not equate to quality by any means. People sometimes behave like lemmings, following trends off a cliff in a great march of popularity.
 
 
+ - 4
Reply  
Donutta
On Tuesday 24 Aug 2010 2:21 PM Posted by Donutta
Popularity != quality, because quality is subjective. That said, if a game is popular, you can assume a lot of people consider it to be quality.

You can never objectively/empirically define quality, because it's all down to the tastes of the person.
 
*  
+ - 5
Reply This comment has been promoted by the community.  
guitar93
On Tuesday 24 Aug 2010 6:39 PM Posted by guitar93
haha Nickelback is popular. wut.
 
 
+ - 0
Reply  
GenBattle
On Wednesday 25 Aug 2010 4:59 PM Posted by GenBattle
24 August 2010, 06:39 PM Reply to guitar93
haha Nickelback is popular. wut.
They are one of the biggest-earning bands in the world. They're also one of the most charitable.
 
 
+ - 2
Reply  
uk_john
On Friday 27 Aug 2010 9:29 PM Posted by uk_john
It is true that with little in the way of sales numbers given out by games publishers, many gamers feel a game has sold well if it has had a lot of hype and believes a game didn;t if it doesn't get much hype.

This means most people are shocked and disbelieving when you point out a game like STALKER has sold more copies on PC than Bioshock, for example!

Also, quite often I will be quoted the combined sales of the console and PC version versus the sales of a PC only game.

You also have the false advertising that the media buys into and regurgitates, like Bethesda saying Fallout 3 had sold more copies than Fallout 1 and 2 combined, and nobody pointed out that Fallout 1 and 2 were PC only and Fallout 3 was on 2 consoles and PC! If you just compare like with like, Fallout 3 on PC did not sell as many copies as Fallout 2, let alone both combined!

So let's hope the games media becomes a little more independent from the games business and starts asking harder questions. If they don't, we will see the quality of games continue to go down and the interest in retro gaming continue to grow (Can 6 million DOSBox downloads not tell us something?)
 
 
+ - 3
Reply  
Imperator
On Monday 30 Aug 2010 2:24 PM Posted by Imperator
The only things you're going to see written on the internet, are things by people who have very strong opinions. And the people who love the game are off playing it.
 
 
+ - 0
Reply  
L0rdGamma
On Monday 6 Sep 2010 4:55 PM Posted by L0rdGamma
I got 1000 out of 1000 and havent touched it since..
 
 
+ - 0
Reply  
ChatterboxZombie
On Monday 6 Sep 2010 10:42 PM Posted by ChatterboxZombie
To answer the name of the blog.
With MMO's, yes.
With anime, No.
 
 
+ - 0
Reply  
daym
On Friday 10 Sep 2010 3:41 PM Posted by daym
popular tiles dont mean there good cause conflict denied ops was a really good game just no one knew about it
 
 
+ - 0
Reply  
Oliver
On Sunday 19 Sep 2010 7:53 PM Posted by Oliver
30 August 2010, 02:24 PM Reply to Imperator
The only things you're going to see written on the internet, are things by people who have very strong opinions. And the people who love the game are off playing it.
Agreed. If you dislike something, you're more likely to cry out about it! If you like it, you'll be busy enjoying it, and certainly less likely to say so.

Negative press attracts attention too, so of course there will be more talk on the bad points of a game.
 
 
+ - 1
Reply  
KapaiZombie
On Saturday 2 Oct 2010 7:12 PM Posted by KapaiZombie
Deciding what the greatest game is always something that'll be met with scrutiny. When you watch a trailer on Youtube of Metal Gear Solid 4 you'll see comments such as greatest game ever made, and then you'll see haters too because their opinion largely differs and this goes for many other game trailers on Youtube. We all have different tastes/interests in gaming, whether it comes down to elements such as story, atmosphere or gameplay, or genre such as shooters, racing games, RPGs and so forth. There's no way of crowning a game with such a title of 'Greatest Game Ever' that everyone will like, but we can decide OUR 'Greatest Game Ever' because that's what matters.
 
 
+ - 0
Reply