Are gamers today getting ripped off?
Published Tuesday 16 Feb 2010 5:03pm |Tags: price, overprice, worth, content, games, gaming
Is it just me or does everyone think that today's games are overpriced, yet the content are not neccessarily worth the money paid? Back in the 90s when we were playing games like Doom and Quake they were priced at around $40, then came the dawn of the new millenia and suddenly game producers think we earn 2000 times the money and the prices rose past the $90 margin. As if that wasn't enough within the last 2 - 3 years games have past the $100 point and are approaching the $200 point, and for what? State of the art graphics with linear gameplay? Graphics are suppose to advance as technology does, and consumers should not have to pay extra when game producers don't need to crack their heads over on getting new technologies.
If the extra money gave us gamers extra gameplay, then I may not complain as much. But many games these days don't require a lot of time to finish and when I pay $140 for a game I would at least want to be able to play it for a few years. Producers claim that the extra price is for the multiplayer experience and the 'extra' content they release after or alongside the game. But many of these so called 'extra' content are merely recycled content that producers try to diguise.
What does the future ahead look like: games that cost more than the console? Only upperclass people with 6 digit earnings can game? $200 for 2 hours of gameplay? I hope not.
You may or may not agree with what I've posted, but above is my opinion on the pricing of games today.
Thank you for reading.
COMMENTS (35)
The thing that ticks me off the most is the fact that DLC is so expensive, 'usually', which makes the already expensive games cost in excess of $200.
Which is freakin B-S.
How incredibly naive...you'd think that "new" technologies would require mass training and understanding to be used? It's not like devs have been using a single game engine for 20 years and just one animation studio.
Also factoring in changes in inflation etc...money is worth less now than it was when doom came out.
Sure games are pricey, but they never make a hell of a lot of money (save for large scale subscription bases and immensely popular games).
To me this blog just screams: "I didnt research enough"
What Deanology said about DLC is spot on though, FPS + Map Packs makes for expensive gaming.
There is a huge difference between Doom with it's sprites and Mass Effect 2 or Uncharted 2 with thier hugely detailed graphics.
Back then the game designers didn't worry much about storytelling and didn't invest as much time and money into the presentation of the game.
Sure the big games are getting more expensive, but with the introduction of downloadable titles, you can get games of the same (or better) quality then those that were full releases a few years ago, and for cheaper.
Riven, for example, which is also for PC and PlayStation was about 5 - 10 million to develop. Because gaming has now gone mainstream it is easier for developers to make bigger budget games. Grand Theft Auto 4 was around $100 million to make. We're essentially getting all the benefits of larger budget games for only a bit more money comparatively.
It's only compared to Americans that we're getting ripped off because they get their games so much cheaper.
If I remember correctly Super Street Fighter $220
Personally though I'm more likely to try a $90 game like straight away than a $150 game.
I bought Valkyria Chronicles and Borderlands for $90 and $80. Very pleased with them.
When they are $150, I normally wait for a sale or shop around. Waited until Resident Evil 5 was on sale and shopped around for Assassins Creed 2
People in this current youth generation are just so used to getting their stuff for free or cheap (usually by download) that they just can't deal with the concept of paying anything substantial for their gear.
I can remember paying $150 plus for mega drive games that in reality, if I played now would only entertain me for a few hours. At the time however being about 7 years old I could replay the same boring sh*t over and over and think it was amazing. But these were still games that were aimed at a broader market than just young kids.
Really I think a lot of games are really good value for how much time it takes to complete them, and how much money goes into development.
For example I payed $100 for Dragon Age: Origins. It took me about 56 hours to finish, that works out at just under 3 cents a minute. Not bad really.
A game costs relatively less than ever before. Buying games from overseas does not necessarily result in you paying less, it all depends on the state of the exchange rate, doesn't it?
If you wan't your games to look pretty and sound all hi-fi, well, all those graphics artists and designers and programmers and audio engineers and music composers and testers aren't going to work for free, certainly no more than you would work for free.
It sounds like the other more mature frequenters of this site like takuyafire and lexcalibur agree on this.
Americans get a lot of stuff for very cheap, but then again, if you get hit by a bus in America and you're not a rich white guy, the ambulance will leave you lying in the street to die. That alone seems like a fair trade for paying a bit more for your games. (Plus, you would also be surrounded by Americans, which in itself is not a pleasant or ideal situation)
PS - Try travelling abroad, to some place like, say, Cambodia, before you bemoan "expensive" video games. Many people on this earth have far more pressing matters, like not having money for food, or a house, or other minor things like that.
Also, this isn't aimed specifically at the author or anyone in particular, so no-one get too defensive or anything please. Ta a bundle
ˆˆˆLOL harsh view of American life or accurate portrayal based on first hand experience?! :-D
"...if you get hit by a bus in America and you're not a rich white guy, the ambulance will leave you lying in the street to die. "
ˆˆˆLOL harsh view of American life or accurate portrayal based on first hand experience?! :-D
That's crap imo.
So..props to Wellington Free Ambulance...
What were talking about again?
I can't comment on PC games since I didn't actually pay for one prior to 2001.
PS - Try travelling abroad, to some place like, say, Cambodia, before you bemoan "expensive" video games. Many people on this earth have far more pressing matters, like not having money for food, or a house, or other minor things like that."
Please fall off your crimethInc. style high-horse.
I'm always hearing about development studios going broke or laying off staff so it's not like they're all making excessive amounts of money by ripping us off.
Please fall off your crimethInc. style high-horse.
Please get some perspective on reality, sonny.
PS - Try travelling abroad, to some place like, say, Cambodia, before you bemoan "expensive" video games. Many people on this earth have far more pressing matters, like not having money for food, or a house, or other minor things like that."
Please fall off your crimethInc. style high-horse.
Please get some perspective on reality, sonny.
BTW, good on you for completely ignoring the main body of my text, which entirely agreed with what *you* stated earlier, and turning around and picking on my post-script, which was just further back-up for the side of the argument we were both supporting. Never mind though - a bit of flip-flopping never hurt anyone, I guess...
Oh no i'm very sorry for living in a first world country. By your standards I shouldn't buy a chopping board 'cause some people would love to have just even a knife.
I'm well aware of the horrible sh*t that goes on in other parts of the world and i'm not ignoring it.
I just think its a bit rich to essentially criticize someone for thinking video games are a bit expensive because of poverty and poor social welfare elsewhere when we're in New Zealand. I disagreed with the sentiment that they're too expensive, but someone still has the right to express it without getting a guilt trip chucked at them.
PS. Why would I make reference to the main body of your comment if it was no different to what I said?
PPS. Don't call me chum, I don't know you.
I was using "chum" in the patronizing sense, pal.
PS: I know i've been bashing activision all through this post but it is only beacause thay are the biggest offenders in this regard (COD and Guitar Hero anyone?)
























Log in to comment or Register now!